Stalin

You know how there exist many people who condemns Stalin for his blah blah blah

And since I just watch a movie on him maybe I shall talk about him

You know at a poll not so long ago a number of (and its a number big enough to shock most people) Russians actually voted that they think Stalin did a great job.

Of course all those Historians slam these poll results and those surveyed.

Now lets look at this from another perspective:

Stalin was (self-elected) to run Russia, to serve Russia and her people.
These historians condemn him for his acts of mass-murder (Mostly non-Russians)

So if we were to base his performance on his original job-scope, what grade does he deserve?

These historians fail to see that if not for the Russian army the Germans might have won WW2 and so what happens then?

These idiots won't get to enjoy hiding in their offices and waste tax-payer's money anymore.

You know you might say "Well Stalin was the leader of one of the two strongest nation on Earth, he had the responsibility to act for the welfare of Earth's citizens!"

Yar right

So can you explain what the fuck happened at Copenhagen?

So we should slam all the people at the summit?

Those people who would rather save a bank than Earth?